首页> 外文OA文献 >Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome
【2h】

Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome

机译:肠易激综合征患儿的腹痛和粪便症状的前瞻性日记数据与回顾性调查表报告之间的一致性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND:In functional gastrointestinal disorders, patient recall of symptoms drives diagnostic decisions and evaluation of treatment response, and research conclusions about potential treatments. In pediatrics, parent report also impacts assessment and care. Hence, identifying methods for accurately capturing patient and parent report of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms is important. This study evaluated correspondence between retrospective questionnaire (parent and child report) and prospective diary data for children and adolescents with IBS.METHODS:Participants included 50 children/adolescents with IBS per Rome III criteria. Children completed a 2-week pain and stool diary. Children and parents subsequently completed a 2-week recall questionnaire, reporting number of pain days, maximum pain, days without bowel movement, and days with diarrhea during the diary interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement.KEY RESULTS:For pain and days without bowel movement, overall agreement between child recall questionnaire and child diary was strong, although under conditions likely to facilitate agreement and with individual variation observed. Parent recall and child diary were less concordant, and agreement about diarrhea was poor for parent and child. Age did not significantly correlate with agreement.CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES:Child questionnaire with short recall interval may be a reasonable approximation for diary data, although this varies by individual and replication/investigation of lengthier recall are needed. Relying on parent questionnaire does not appear a suitable proxy, and recall of stool form by both parent and child appears more problematic. These results combined with existing literature support use of diary data whenever possible.
机译:背景:在功能性胃肠道疾病中,患者对症状的记忆将驱动诊断决策和对治疗反应的评估,并得出有关潜在治疗方法的研究结论。在儿科中,家长报告也会影响评估和护理。因此,准确识别患者和父母对肠易激综合症(IBS)症状的报告的识别方法很重要。这项研究评估了回顾性调查表(父母和儿童报告)与IBS儿童和青少年的前瞻性日记数据之间的对应关系。方法:参与者包括50名符合罗马三世标准的IBS儿童/青少年。儿童完成了为期2周的疼痛和大便日记。儿童和父母随后完成了为期2周的回忆调查表,报告了在日记间隔内的痛苦天数,最大痛苦,无排便天数和有腹泻天数。组内相关系数和Bland-Altman图评估一致性。关键结果:对于疼痛和无排便天数,儿童回忆问卷和儿童日记之间的总体一致性很强,尽管在可能促进一致性和观察到个体差异的条件下。父母的回忆和孩子的日记不太协调,父母之间关于腹泻的共识很差。结论与推论:回忆间隔短的儿童问卷可能是日记数据的合理近似值,尽管因人而异,并且需要重复/调查更长的回忆。依靠父母问卷调查似乎没有合适的替代方法,父母和孩子召回粪便形式似乎更成问题。这些结果与现有文献相结合,尽可能支持使用日记数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号